Tuesday, January 6, 2009
Barack Obama Is Your New Food Critic
Friday, November 14, 2008
A Pacific Relative of the Garbage Plate?
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Pillsbury Doughboy: Not Allowed within 1000 feet of school
Spreading the Wealth, and the Chili
Food, in Perspective
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Cooking with eggs
Sunday, September 21, 2008
Foodstuff of the week: Applewood-smoked bacon
- Breakfast tacos w/scrambled eggs, cheddar cheese, and corn tortillas (I suggest using flour, but I picked up corn--oh well).
- "Chicken à la king" (or something like it, at least). First, dice bacon into small pieces (I believe the French call them "lardons," but I call them freedom slices) and sauté over medium-high heat to desired doneness. Remove from pan and drain the bacon, and drain most of the grease from the pan, reserving some (or a lot, depending on how much fat you want in the dish). Then, sauté diced chicken thighs (chicken breast or tenderloin is fine, really whatever you have), seasoned with salt and pepper, in the same pan at medium-high heat. As soon as the chicken is cooked, add one can of cream of mushroom soup to the pan and 4 0z. (half a can) of milk. Stir to incorporate chicken and heat until bubbling (a good time to add drained peas or carrots, if desired/available). Right before serving, add the bacon back to the pan and incorporate. Season with salt and pepper to taste. Serve over toasted English muffin, waffle, toast, or starch of your choice (this would be great over mashed potatoes, rice, etc.).
- Potato and bacon hash was also attempted, but this item needs some perfecting before I encourage anyone to make it. It was still tasty, albeit a bit too greasy.
- French toast, topped with Nutella and strawberry preserves.
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Banal Articles about Lunch and Oliver Wendell Holmes
Far too often, the most uninspired meal of the day is the one I eat sitting at my desk, juggling a Cosi sandwich, napkin and computer mouse as I try to eat while writing or editing.
I'll tell you what's uninspiring: the quality of this article. I'm pretty sure he wrote it while juggling a Cosi sandwich, napkin, and computer mouse.I sincerely doubt that this has been edited, what with its four rhetorical questions, disjointed topics, and lack of description regarding the taste of the recipes.
I understand that different sections of the newspaper employ different voices to tell their stories. Yes, the article speaks to a daily question that many of us face: "What's for lunch?"Who knows, maybe the author is tyring to be a New Journalist, putting himself at the center of the story, helping us understand our own quiet culinary desperation through his own stream-of-consciousness search to answer that existential noontime question.
But clear communication skills don't become less important when talking about lunchtime or when they're on page F01. In class today, my property professor read a passage from Oliver Wendell Holmes's concurring opinion in International New Service v. Associated Press, where Holmes's language is impenetrable. After letting the fog of the passage envelop us, my prof yelled, "Holmes! A verb!"
After reading this, I wanted to yell, "Post! Some structure!" In that sense, the author here is keeping good company; I doubt he intended this article to draw him a comparison to Oliver Wendell Holmes, but here it is, out there on the intertubes, ready for someone to do a "Google" and repeat it.
But the point is this: it doesn't matter if you're writing a Supreme Court decision or a food column: the ways in which, and the ability with which, we communicate with one another dictates how we fare, both individually, and as a society. Write a mediocre, mid-week column on homemade lunches, you'll get by well enough, but don't expect to become the next Anton Ego. Write poorly in a judicial opinion, and expect attorneys, state agencies, law students and faculty for the next century to be debating your meaning. Tell the nation that "the fundamentals of our economy are strong" the day that two Wall Street giants bite the dust, and you'll lose your campaign for the presidency.*
* I hope.