Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Rabbit at Rest

John Updike, one of the greatest (and certainly most prolific) American writers of the past century, passed away today at age 76.  I first encountered Updike's writing in high school, critiquing (such as it was) Rabbit, Run and one of his short stories.  I can't go so far as to say that he was a life-changing writer, but I always appreciated his ability, like so many great writers, to transition between fiction and non-fiction writing.  One of my favorite non-fiction essays, and one of his best-known, is his essay on Ted Williams' last game at Fenway Park, Hub Fans Bid Kid Adieu:

Like a feather caught in a vortex, Williams ran around the square of bases at the center of our beseeching screaming. He ran as he always ran out home runs - hurriedly, unsmiling, head down, as if our praise were a storm of rain to get out of. He didn't tip his cap. Though we thumped, wept, and chanted ''We want Ted'' for minutes after he hid in the dugout, he did not come back. Our noise for some seconds passed beyond excitement into a kind of immense open anguish, a wailing, a cry to be saved. But immortality is nontransferable. The papers said that the other players, and even the umpires on the field, begged him to come out and acknowledge us in some way, but he refused. Gods do not answer letters.

 He will be missed.

"Don't hit anything, and drive like you stole it."

My van certification would have come in handy for this.

(H/T The Plank)

Sunday, January 25, 2009

In Which We Become Far Too Invested in the Athletic Exploits of 18-22 Year Olds (Myself Included) Con't

As an addendum: I realize that, at the extreme, I am advocating an incredibly tame style of fandom, one where there is only positive cheering, and never any criticism of any non-professional team.  I understand that's not likely--or maybe even desirable--but if people were to err on the side of deep breathing rather than loud screaming, they may find more enjoyment in the wins and less frustration in the losses.

In Which We Become Far Too Invested in the Athletic Exploits of 18-22 Year Olds (Myself Included)

3 straight Hoya losses have the faithful reeling, and with some justification: in the past two games, the team has been a half-step slow and 6 inches off the mark against West Virginia and Seton Hall.  It's a much different look from the team that shredded UConn on the road, or thumped Syracuse about 10 days ago, and for fans who have invested a lot of time, energy and (yes) money into their support of the team, it's unsettling.

That said, just as it's bizarre in victory to elevate college athletes to demigod status (H/T: The Plank), it's bizarre to pile on a group of college athletes in defeat (even unpleasant and unexpected ones to Seton Hall) as if their goal is to please us, The Excited Fan, and when they fail, we can express our disappointment however we please.  Obviously, no one is stopping fans from yelling out complaints from the stands or online, and we can bellow about bad shots or shoddy defense as loudly as we want.  But it strikes me as just the slightest bit odd that these 18 to 22 year olds are being held to a standard of excellence--and in college basketball and football--that is not expected of 18 to 22 year olds in college more broadly.  Lose 3 games in a row? I know people who have skipped class 3 weeks in a row.  In a shooting slump? I've been in writing slumps/testing slumps.  Groaning after missed free throws? Good thing nobody groaned when people couldn't answer questions in class (although in law school, it sometimes feels that way).  

It's a bit of a chicken-or-the-egg argument, to be sure: when college sports (particularly football and basketball) are marketed like their professional counterparts, when the coaches are paid comparably to their professional counterparts, and are played in arenas and stadiums as large, if not larger, than their professional counterparts, it's understandable that fans have reactions that resemble those at professional sporting events.  With the college sports-media industrial complex occupying such a prominent national status, it seems unlikely that the scale of the competition is going to decrease anytime soon.  Conversely, maybe we should be expecting a bit more of 18 to 22 year olds in college--certainly, when it comes to effort-based measures such as showing up to class and/or being prepared for class, the bar could be raised a bit.

Pointing out that college students loaf, coast, and generally "take plays off" doesn't make it any easier to watch our favorite teams lose heartbreakers or stinkers.  But maybe those who cheer on those college teams--particularly those who graduated from those schools-- could remember what it was like to be an undergraduate and ease up on their underage heroes.  After all, they are student athletes, and as such, not only are they busy with classes and growing up, but they're members of the alumni family.   We seem to cut a lot more slack for alums who help start unjustified wars than for those who hoist up unjustified 3s.  Just saying.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Quote of the Moment

I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear...

Honestly, it was all over but the shouting after that today.  A thunderclap in American history.

But check out the speech here.  Obama sets the bar pretty high, and a lot of the initial feedback--and my initial perception from listening to it live--was that it was a really good, but not excellent, speech.  Just a standard Obama speech: strong, bringing the heat.  After reading it, however, it registers just how appropriate his tone was for the troubles facing the nation.  Much like his acceptance speech in Grant Park, there's no sugarcoating our problems--indeed, during parts of the speech, I thought he was going to have to turn around and ask outgoing President Bush if he wanted to excuse himself for parts of it that were, shall we say, not kind in recounting the past 8 years.   It made the pivot to the more optimistic, value-stating portion a relief--not only to alleviate the potential awkwardness of skewering a former President sitting feet away from the podium, but also to lift the spirits of the crowds.  

In person, the relief of moving on to a renewed values statement for the nation outweighed the words themselves.  But I have a sneaking suspicion that the words themselves will echo through the years, much more so than the discomfort of being reminded about our present (and recent past) foibles.

We've been waiting for this hour/history is ours


Setting up a blog seemed like an ideal fit for me: with an appetite for politics, social justice, sports, music, Washington, DC, and pop culture--and an opinion on most of these things--a blog was, and is, an ideal vehicle to hone my writing (conciseness has not necessarily been one of my strong suits) and to share some thoughts on my interests outside of law school.

But today, after experiencing Inauguration Weekend, I am momentarily speechless. The historical significance sets in, every now and then, and this evening is one of those moments. I'll try to reflect and string together some complete sentences in the next few days, but for now, I'll leave you with some photos.

Above: a view from our spot on the Mall.

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Midweek Musical Break



"American Tune," Paul Simon.  Tune originally by J.S. Bach, "O Sacred Head Surrounded."

Monday, January 12, 2009

Extra spicy

In an otherwise insightful post on food policy and the incoming Obama administration, blogger Ezra Klein takes an off-the-mark pot shot at Ben's Chili Bowl.  "(One of DC's most overrated institutions, incidentally)," Klein remarks on Ben's.  I've waited to see if there would be a clarifying post, but none has come.  Ergo, it's on.  

This is wrong.  Horribly, horribly wrong.   Ben's is both symbolically and literally a significant marker of Washington in the post-war era.  Its history is real, and it is meaningful, even if some in the blognoscenti choose to ignore it.  Imagine if someone said that Katz's Deli wasn't a worthy New York institution, or Pat's could be skipped on a tour of Philadelphia.  They'd be laughed out of town.
 
To be generous, maybe Klein meant that the food at Ben's is overrated.  Still wrong.  Horribly, horribly wrong.  Maybe he doesn't like it.  That's fine.  But as one of Klein's commenters notes Ben's does chili dogs, cheese fries, and half-smokes,  all day and most of the night, come riots or construction.  No place else in DC, to my knowledge, hits this market--it's surprisingly hard to find a half-smoke on the street-- and while it's not haute cuisine, it's hot cuisine at affordable prices, even after the gentrification of U Street.  And nobody, to my knowledge, has ever claimed that Ben's was up for Michelin stars.

In the lingo of Bill Simmons, and one of the commenters, Ben's is properly rated.  The hype is big, for sure, but it backs it up.  

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Shredded Cheese=Pro Move

Lost in the flurry of coverage of Barack Obama's "inaugural" trip to Ben's Chili Bowl yesterday was his order: a half-smoke with everything (mustard, onions, and chili) and a side of cheese fries, with shredded cheese-- "not the Velveeta," #44 specifically called for.  The fully-loaded half smoke is a great call, but even more impressive is the order for shredded cheese on the fries.  Now, I'm not sure about the plain cheese fries, but on the chili cheese fries served at Ben's on U (which, given its overflowing size, is easily one of the best deals in town), traditionally an enjoyable, yet of-indeterminate-origin, cheese sauce smothers the fries along with the signature chili.  However, at the the Ben's outpost at the new Nationals Stadium, chili cheese fries come with shredded cheddar, a step up on the culinary ladder (while a parallel move, health-wise), so I know that the Ali family doesn't have a moral objection to shredded cheese on cheese fries with chili.  Nevertheless, I've always been too intimidated to order the chili cheese fries with shredded cheese at the original Ben's--until now.  Perhaps they'll call it "Obama-style" cheese fries.

Friday, January 9, 2009

Blagojevich: King of Unintentional Comedy

Going down, guns a-blazin'.  If shakedowns are The Chicago Way, then this picture is the final shootout from The Untouchables, complete with the infant.  





Thursday, January 8, 2009

Quarterback problems

Malcolm Gladwell tackled (no pun intended) teacher recruiting and the similarities with NFL quarterbacking a few weeks back.  Here's the nut graf:

This is the quarterback problem. There are certain jobs where almost nothing you can learn about candidates before they start predicts how they'll do once they're hired. So how do we know whom to choose in cases like that? In recent years, a number of fields have begun to wrestle with this problem, but none with such profound social consequences as the profession of teaching.

That's not quite true.  In his effort to reduce public school teaching into an easily (too?) digestible concept, Gladwell races by the obvious: the NFL, for all of its struggles finding the next John Elway, limits its search to college quarterbacks.  And that's worked out pretty well for pro football.  This isn't to say that schools/TFA like programs shouldn't find great teachers from the ranks of the non-education majors, but maybe Division 1 of future teachers isn't Georgetown, but schools of education.  TFA would disagree, but it certainly complicates the metaphor, no?

On a related note: is it really easy, by comparison, to determine who's going to be a top baseball player?  Probably not; with the exception of a left-hander who throws 90 mph, there aren't many hard and fast prospects with a future. Moreover, from the challenge of adjusting to wood bats in the pros from aluminum in school to facing players with 10-15 years more experience, there's an adjustment similarly challenging for baseball.  There's a Wood Bat Problem, if you will.  To figure out who's ready for The Show, baseball has not only extensive scouting, but also an extensive farm system of paid baseball where it determines who the best future players are.  Some guys can't hit the ball out of the infield in rookie ball with a wood bat, while other guys just can't hit a major league curveball, leading to a successful AAA career, like Jeff Manto.  

Education is arguably (okay, fine, inarguably) more important and more deserving of our investment than high-caliber baseball players, so why can't we make a similar investment in an educational farm system/apprenticeship system? Lawyers don't walk out of law school and argue cases in front of the Supreme Court; doctors don't hang up their cap and gown and scrub in for neurosurgery; electricians don't finish their classes and head up the wiring for a new skyscraper.  So why do we make teachers head into a live classroom with (at best) a few semesters of in-class time?  The farm system metaphor isn't perfect (raise your hand if you want to go to the AA school district instead of the National League),  but there's gotta be a way to give passionate new teachers more reps, either through observation or through team-teaching, before being thrown out on their own.  

Gladwell, of all people, should understand that practice makes perfect; he's making millions right now telling people that 10,000 hours of practice makes an expert.

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Cultural Insensitivity Alert

Courtesy of ESPN again:

On Theo Ratliff's multiple rejections of Chinese-born Yao Ming: "That toy has been recalled."

At least he didn't mention lead.

Tuesday, January 6, 2009

Barack Obama Is Your New Food Critic

Next up: old footage of Barack Obama participating on your local public television fund drive?


18 to vote for Obama, 21 to drink on Obama's dime

Young people's ball announced for the "low" price of $75.  Sounds intriguing, but my eye is drawn more to the Neighborhood Ball, a free/low-cost ball at the Convention Center on the 20th.  The Neighborhood Ball, hosted at the Convention Center is also close to Ben's Chili Bowl, which strikes me as the perfect post-Inaugural Ball meal.  

Monday, January 5, 2009

Laws with Unintended Consequences

From Jill, an interesting article that is touching off discussions in both the personal finance blogosphere and a small, yet important, sector of the retail industry.  A little known law called the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) is about to go in effect that requires any product sold for users 12 years old and under--like toys, backpacks, and clothing--to be tested for lead and other chemicals.  This isn't a problem for large manufacturers (who can easily swallow the added costs of testing), and it's fantastic for children, who will (presumably) not be consuming products that have lead in it anymore, but it's posing serious problems for small toymakers, retailers, and consignment/thrift store owners, whose margins are either too small, or non-existent as non-profits, to pay for testing of second hand stores.

 What doesn't get covered in the article is that this doesn't seem to affect clothing donations, just items that are sold.  Now, obviously, there are a ton of issues differentiating buying from a thrift store and going to a clothing bank, but at least on some level, the law doesn't prevent those who most need to clothe their children to get the clothes they need. 

The other thing is that this is just a matter of one or two fallow cycles of hand-me-downs.  Presumably, in a few months to years, a generation of kids will outgrow their new, tested clothes, and they'll enter the second-hand stream.  There will be some lumps in the next few months and years, but it doesn't have to be the death blow some of these owners are making it out to be.  

That said, it seems like there should be a grandfather clause/some sort of phasing in to mitigate this.  While kids shouldn't be subjected to leaded clothing, it seems like the business concerns of these small consignment/thrift stores should be represented, at least to some degree, and at least concerning clothing.  

Welcome to the New Neighbors

The Obama Family has moved into the Hay-Adams for the next two weeks until the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW move out.  Perhaps he'll choose GULC's Sports and Fitness Center for his daily workout?